۴۲. منابع
آهوئی، محمدرضا(1375) هنجاریابی مقدّماتی آزمون هوش رایموند. ب، کتل دانشآموزان 6/14- 6/17 سال شهر نیشابور در سال تحصیلی 74-75؛ به راهنمایی: ولیّالله فرزاد، پایاننامه (کارشناسی ارشد)، دانشگاه تربیت معلم
جوکار، بهرام (1372) هنجاریابی مقیاس 2 آزمون هوشی فرهنگ ناوابسته کتل برای کودکان مدارس ابتدایی و راهنمایی شهر شیراز؛ به راهنمایی: اصغر رضویّه، پایاننامه (فوقلیسانس)، دانشگاه شیراز
دائمی، حمیدرضا (1376) هنجاریابی مقدّماتی آزمون خلّاقیّت عابدی در مدارس دوره متوسّطه منطقهٔ6 تهران در سال تحصیلی، پایاننامه (کارشناسی ارشد) دانشگاه تربیت معلّم
صوفی، صلاح ( 1376) هنجاریابی مقدّماتی آزمون هوشی کتل فرم الف 2 برای دانشآموزان دختر و پسر 11 تا 14 سال شهر سقّز در سال تحصیلی 1374-1375؛ به راهنمایی: ولیّالله فرزاد، پایاننامه (کارشناسی ارشد)، دانشگاه تربیت معلم
عابدی، جمال (1372) خلّاقیّت و شیوهای نو در اندازهگیری آن، پژوهشهای روانشناختی، دوره 2 شماره 1و2، صفحات 46-54
Aliotti, Nicholas C. (1979). Educational Stimulation, Creativity, Intelligence and School Readiness in Young Children.
Chan, David W (2008). Giftedness of Chinese Students in Hong Kong: Perspectives from Different Conceptions of Intelligences , Gifted Child Quarterly, v52 n1 p40-54
Clapham, Maria M. (2004). The Convergent Validity of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking and Creativity Interest InventoriesEducational and Psychological Measurement, 64(5), 828-841.
Day, H. I.; Langevin, R,(1969). Curiosity and Intelligence: Two Necessary Conditions for a High Level of Creativity.J Spec Educ, 3(3), 263-8.
Dellas, Marie (1971). Effects of Creativity Training, Defensiveness, and Intelligence on Divergent Thinking.
Doherty, William J.; Corsini, David A. (1976). Creativity, Intelligence, and Moral Development in College Women. Journal of Creative Behavior, 10(4), 276-84
Follman, John; And Others (1973). Multivariate Analysis of the Relationship between Creativity and Intelligence.
Fuchs-Beauchamp et al., (1993). Creativity and Intelligence in Preschoolers. Gifted Child Quarterly, 37 (3), 113-17
Gagné, F. (1991). Toward a differentiated model of giftedness and talent. In N. Colangelo and G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 65-80). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Washington
Gardner, Howard & Hatch, Thomas (1989). Multiple Intelligences Go To School; Educational Researcher; American Educational Research Association, Vol. 18, No. 8 p. 6
Gould, Kathryn Lewis (1972). Relationships of Creativity, Reading Comprehension, Intelligence, and Response to a Literature Selection for Fourth Grade Inner-City Children.
Hattie, John; Rogers, H. Jane (1986). Factor Models for Assessing the Relationship between Creativity and Intelligence.Journal of Educational Psychology, 78 (6), 482-85 .
Hetrick, Suzanne H.; And Others (1966). Figural Creativity, Intelligence, and Personality in Children: A Factor Analytic Study.
Hocevar, Dennis (1980). Intelligence, Divergent Thinking, and Creativity. Intelligence, v4 n1 p 25-40
Jacobs, John F.; Cunningham, Myron A. (1969). Creativity and Intelligence: Their Relation to Peer Acceptance. JSpec Educ, 3(3), 269-74.
Khatena, Joe (1989). Intelligence and Creativity to Multitalent.
Kim, Kyung Hee (2005).Can Only Intelligent People Be Creative? A Meta-Analysis, Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, v16 n2-3 p57-66.
Kitano, Margie. K.; Kirby, Darrell, F.(1986). Gifted education: a comprehensive view. Little, Brown and company. P.25-26,201.
Krop, Harry (1969). Effects of Extrinsic Motivation, Intrinsic Motivation, and Intelligence on Creativity: A Factorial Approach. J Gen Psychol, 80, 259-66.
Monks, Franz (1992). Development of gifted children: The issue of identification and progranning. In Franz J. Monks and Willy Peters (Eds) Talent for the Future. (pp. 191-202).Van Gorcum & Comp B.V.
Prieto, F; Sanchez, F.(2005). Intelligence and creativity, Journal of Research in Educational Psychology,3(3),21-50
Renzulli, Joseph S. (1998). The Three-Ring Conception of Giftedness, In Baum, S. M., Reis, S. M., & Maxfield, L. R. (Eds.). (1998). Nurturing the gifts and talents of primary grade students. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
Rindermann, H.; Neubauer, A. C. (2004). Processing Speed, Intelligence, Creativity, and School Performance: Testing of Causal Hypotheses Using Structural Equation Models. Intelligence, 32 (6), 573-589 .
Runco, Mark A. (1986). The discriminant validity of gifted children's divergent thinking test scores, Gifted Child Quarterly, 30(2), 78-82.
Runco, Mark A.; Albert, Robert S, (1985). The reliability and validity of ideational originality in the divergent thinking of academically gifted and nongifted children. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 45(3), 483-501.
Runco, Mark A.; Albert, Robert S, (1986). The Threshold theory regarding creativity and intelligence: An empirical test with gifted and nongifted children.Creative Child and Adult Quarterly, 11 (4), 212-18 .
Shaw, Geraldine A. (1985). The use of imagery by intelligent and by creative schoolchildren. Journal of General Psychology, 112(2), 153-171.
Soh, Kay-Cheng (2000). Indexing Creativity Fostering Teacher Behavior: A Preliminary Validation Study. , Journal of Creative Behavior, v34 n2 p118-34
Sternberg, Robert J. (1989). Three-facet model of Creativity. In Robert J. Sternberg (Ed) The nature of creativity. (pp. 132-138).Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, Robert J. and Davidson, Janet E. (1985). Cognitive development in the gifted and talented. In Frances Degen Horowitz & Marion O Brien (Eds) The gifted and talented (37-70). American Psychological Association.
Sternberg, Robert J. and Davidson, Janet E. (2005). Conceptions of Giftedness , Second Edition; Cambridge University Press
Sternberg, Robert J.; Lubart, Todd I. (1993).Creative Giftedness: A Multivariate Investment Approach. In Donald J Treffinger, Creativity and Giftedness. (pp 141-155) Thousand Oaks, California Corwin Press.
Tannenbaum, A. J. (1992). Early signs of giftedness: Research and commentary. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 15, 104-133.
Relationship between intelligence and creativity of the gifted students
Nasseroddin Kazemi Haghighi Ph.D.
CO-President in Iranian Council for Exceptional Children (I.C.E.C)
ABSRACT:
for comparing “Factorial approach” with “Interaction approach” about of giftedness, examines relationship between intelligence and creativity of the gifted students. Interaction approach discusses whether giftedness involves creativity and Factorial approach refers to creativity is not necessary factor to giftedness. Cattle's Intelligence Test, Berger's Personality Test (Emotion Scale) and the Abedi Creativity Test were administered to 324 gifted students (158 male and 166 female, in grades 6-10, with a mean I.Q. of 137). The results indicated that no significant correlation exist intelligence and creativity of the gifted students. The analysis result from SPSS of Pearson Correlation is: 0.003; (P＜0.001.). The findings from the study indicate sufficient evidence to support the Factorial approach and threshold theory nevertheless, do not confirm the Interaction approach. It is concluded that correlation between intelligence and creativity of the gifted students depends on the tests, gender, age and intelligence quotient differences.
KEYWORDS: Adolescent, creativity, giftedness, intelligence, theories